Milanista
Mangiamoli!
Re: Blu Ray/HD-DVD war
I'm not assuming... it even says HDTV lol
Its a movie.
I'm not assuming... it even says HDTV lol
Its a movie.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Holio said:Man thats the funniest news I have EVER read. :roll: :-k
RuneEdge said:Keep banging your head against that wall cuz its still not funny...
LMAO. I dont even have an Xbox. You're the only fanboy here, you Sony lover.ThomasGOAL said:Normal you are a Xbox fanboy :roll:
Blu Ray win few points again...
You only told me you like the NDS AFTER someone called you a fanboy, which if you read again, it wasnt me who originally made that accusation.djdavedoc said:RuneEdge, even though you called me a PSP Fanboy when Im not I actually do like the DS as well, You make a good point. ThomasGoal has done nothing but slam anything Xbox 360 related and has sung the full praises of Sony and PS3....
DJ
ashmufc said:Pretty cheap dont you think? As the Blu Ray standalone players will be $1000+
Anyway, this might be a cheap alternative, especially if you have a HTPC.
Anyway, the Blu-Ray Media must be very expensive.
If you're one of the first adopters who mortgaged the house to buy the earliest HDTV displays, don't expect to get full HD resolution when you take out a second mortgage for a high-def disc player when they come out later this year.
Today the copy-protection rules for Blu-ray or HD DVD — the two formats competing to be the standard for HD discs — are being unveiled. Called Advanced Access Content System (AACS), the rules clearly show the major movie studios are determined to stymie potential piracy, but their efforts may short-change people with older HDTVs.
AACS says the new players won't output a full-HD signal from their component-video connections, since those jacks are analog instead of digital and thus have no copy protection. The "down-rezzed" signals will be limited to a resolution of 960 x 540 pixels — exactly one-quarter the 1,920 x 1,080 pixels that you'll get through the copy-protected digital connectors on the players.
The potentially huge problem with this strategy is that the only HD inputs on a lot of older HDTVs are component video. Estimates vary, but it's believed 3 to 6.6 million such displays are in U.S. households. And the sun will set on analog video for good after Dec. 31, 2013, when AACS-licensed players can't be made or sold with any analog video outputs, including the familiar yellow composite-video jack.
No they are not releasing the price because if it is ANYTHING less than $1000 NO ONE is going to be a Samsung Blu-Ray player or any other stand alone Blu-Ray player. If I know right now that I can get a PS3 for $700 in November why in the world would I got drop $1000 on a stand alone Blu-Ray player that can only play movies?
The PS3 is actually what is going to kill the Blu-Ray format... it alienates too many of the other hardware manufacturers out there! Why do you think no one else make a UMD player?
And think of how much porn these babies can hold.Whatever makes my x-rated movies look better will be the one I purchase.
Myth: Blu-ray has more capacity.
Reality: Follow me carefully here, because the distinction I’m going to make does not rule out the possibility that Blu-ray will indeed, ultimately offer more storage capacity.
While Blu-ray is (theoretically) capable of delivering a dual-layer 25GB disc for a total of 50GB’s, the truth of the matter is, the Blu-ray (movie) titles Sony has shipped thus far are on single layer 25GB discs.
So in reality as of today Wednesday the 28th of June 2006, HD-DVD discs at dual-layer 15GB for a total of 30GB offer more capacity than Blu-ray, I’ll repeat that, as of right now HD-DVD is delivering more capacity than Blu-ray. That kind of flies in the face of everything we’ve heard about Blu-ray thus far huh?
The HD-DVD camp has even reported the development new window of a 45GB (3-layer) disc. And while I’ll have to take a ‘believe it when I see it’ stance on that one, I’m a lot more likely to believe someone who promised less capacity (It was assumed the first HD-DVD’s would be single layer 15GB) and delivered more, over someone who promised more capacity and delivered less.
Of course Sony could trump all of this by delivering their dual-layer 50GB discs, or even their 4 layer (yes four layers!) 100GB discs, but until it’s on the store shelves and playing in Blu-ray players, you’ll have to forgive me for being less than convinced.